Lectures sur l’équité dans le processus de nomination de personnel académique

Diversité parmi le corps professoral

Henry, F.,Dua, E., James, C.E., Kobayashi, A., Li, P., Ramos, H., and Smith, M.S., The Equity Myth, Racialization and Indigeneity at Canadian Universities, 2017: UBC Press | The Equity Myth
ACPPU. Éducation postsecondaire : qu’en est-il de la diversité et de l’équité au sein du corps enseignant? 2018: Sous-représentés et sous-payés
Chaires de recherche du Canada :

University of Michigan STRIDE Faculty Recruitment Workshop WHAT CAN WE DO? TOP 10 BEST PRACTICES
Chronicle of Higher Education. Diversifying Your Campus: Key Insights and Models for Change. 2021: Diversifying Your Campus – Chronicle Store
Lederman, D. The Challenges of Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Faculty and Administrators. Inside Higher Education 2020

Partialité dans les lettres de référence

Madera, J.M., Hebl, M.R., Dial, H. et al., Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact. 2019: Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact | SpringerLink

Iwen, M., Letters of Recommendation: Just Say No. 2019: https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2019/04/10/letters-recommendation-reaffirm-entrenched-systems-bias-and-exclusion-opinion

Akos P, Kretchmar J., Gender and Ethnic bias in Letters of Recommendation: Considerations for School Counselors. Professional School Counseling. 2016: Gender and Ethnic bias in Letters of Recommendation: Considerations for School Counselors - Patrick Akos, Jennifer Kretchmar, 2016 (sagepub.com)

Schmader, T., Whitehead, J. & Wysocki, V.H. A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants. Sex Roles. 2007. A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants | SpringerLink

Affichages de poste

Kang, S., Decelles, K., Tilcsik, A., Jun, S.. The Unintended Consequences of Diversity Statements. Harvard Business Review. 2016: The Unintended Consequences of Diversity Statements (hbr.org)

Examen de candidature

Sensoy, Ö. & Diangelo, R.. We Are All for Diversity, but . . .”: How Faculty Hiring Committees Reproduce Whiteness and Practical Suggestions for How They Can Change. Harvard Educational Review. 2017: Harvard Educational Review Winter 2017 (ocufa.on.ca)

Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A. & Ritzke, D.. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study. Sex Roles. 1999: The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study | SpringerLink

Sondages d’opinion des étudiants sur la qualité de l’enseignement

Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., and Stark, P.B.. Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Research. 2016: Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness – ScienceOpen

ACPPU. Énoncé de principes sur l’utilisation des sondages d’opinion des étudiants. 2016: Utilisation des sondages d’opinion des étudiants | ACPPU

OCUFA. Student Evaluations of Teaching: https://ocufa.on.ca/student-evaluations-of-teaching/

Peterson, D.A.M., Biederman, L.A., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T.M., Roe, K.. Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLOS ONE. 2019: Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching - PubMed (nih.gov)

Ryerson University v Ryerson Faculty Association. In The Matter of an Interest Arbitration, 2018: 2018 CanLII 58446 (ON LA) | Ryerson University v Ryerson Faculty Association | CanLII

UOITFA. Student Course Evaluation Working Group Final Report. 2017: Student Course Evaluation Working Group Final Report – UOIT Faculty Association