CHANGING PRIORITIES – ACADIA BY NUMBERS

SUMMARY

 

I have once again looked at the numbers from the audited financial reports and added the most recent numbers to my ongoing longitudinal look at spending trends at the university. The full report can be viewed at http://www.caut.ca/aufa/newsletter/0309/financialanalysis.htm.

 

The 2007-08 total expenditures were slightly over $72 million and that represents a drop of about $4.5 million from the previous year. It is encouraging that total expenditures have finally started to fall in response to our declining enrolment revenue. Nevertheless, the university’s expenses were in excess of revenues by $6.6 million. The university has been in this situation consistently since 2003 and the amount has risen steadily during that time – last year it was $5.3 million.

 

Table 1 below gives how the monies were dispersed by sector.

 

Year

Academic

Plant

Admin

Library

Student Services

Other

Ancillary

Total

2000

27964

3974

3754

2152

2534

2828

10776

53982

2001

29832

4450

4740

2264

2624

2840

10923

57673

2002

31661

4495

4978

2338

2848

2986

11857

61163

2003

33536

5254

5084

2364

2884

2685

13811

65618

2004

34499

5202

5859

2438

2964

3717

16111

70790

2005

33583

5288

6915

2513

3279

3492

15172

70242

2006

36210

5707

6616

3012

3970

4260

15279

75054

2007

36884

5791

7711

3047

3709

4433

15020

76595

2008

35450

6662

8590

2766

3477

4939

10216

72102

Table 1 – Spending by sector since 2000.  All amounts are in thousands of dollars.

 

 

Year

Academic

Plant

Admin

Library

Student Services

Other

Ancillary

Total

2000

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2001

6.7

12.0

26.3

5.2

3.6

0.4

1.4

6.8

2002

13.2

13.1

32.6

8.6

12.4

5.6

10.0

13.3

2003

19.9

32.2

35.4

9.9

13.8

-5.1

28.2

21.6

2004

23.4

30.9

56.1

13.3

17.0

31.4

49.5

31.1

2005

20.1

33.1

84.2

16.8

29.4

23.5

40.8

30.1

2006

29.5

43.6

76.2

40.0

56.7

50.6

41.8

39.0

2007

31.9

45.7

105.4

41.6

46.4

56.8

39.4

41.9

2008

26.8

67.6

128.8

28.5

37.2

74.6

-5.2

33.6

Table 2 – Percentage increase in expenses by sector relative to 2000.

 

From Table 2 we can see that total expenses in 2008 were 33.6% higher than in 2000. All sectors, with the exception of Ancillary, Academic and Library, had growth that exceeded the average growth. In order to examine these trends more closely, we extracted detailed data from the statements on how the monies were spent in the Academic and Administration sectors.

 

Year

Total Wages

Fringe Benefits

Supplies

Ext. contr. Serv.

Travel

Prof. fees

Other

 

2000

19120

2040

5831

239

599

93

22

 

2001

19777

1856

7179

222

686

74

19

 

2002

20551

2250

7835

218

718

37

18

 

2003

22003

2475

7248

264

744

144

22

 

2004

22776

3586

6826

283

762

236

9

 

2005

24266

3259

4836

237

738

206

25

 

2006

25980

4203

4787

182

818

173

58

 

2007

27408

3441

4726

219

786

266

31

 

2008

26457

3208

4704

205

752

81

38

 

Table 3 – Details for expenditures in the academic sector.  All amounts are in thousands of dollars.

 

 

Total Wages

Fringe Benefits

Supplies

Ext. contr. Serv.

Travel

Prof. fees

Other

2000

1775

432

1083

55

164

193

52

2001

2365

565

1017

64

155

269

73

2002

2711

582

529

105

237

283

45

2003

2746

544

819

60

209

269

58

2004

3140

753

1033

77

175

316

63

2005

3841

969

1219

45

259

254

77

2006

3385

978

1230

34

357

286

98

2007

3624

1879

1328

27

310

221

101

2008

3811

2560

1131

97

287

421

100

Table 4 – Details for expenditures in the administration sector.  All amounts in thousands of dollars.

Two disturbing trends are observed here. Total wages in the administration sector have grown substantially over this time period (about 115% relative to 2000) while the academic wages have grown by 38.4%. Supplies in the academic sector have decreased steadily since 2002, and in 2008 were over $1 million less than was spent in 2000. There is no parallel pattern in the administrative supplies expenses.

 

The startling increases in fringe benefits in the administrative sector are due to the special payments required for the all-employee pension plan.

 

It is useful to look to external measures to see if these patterns are consistent with other institutions. Table 5 contains Canadian Association of University Business Officers (CAUBO) data on expense by sector.

 

Instruction

External

Physical

Student

Admin

Computing

Library

Non-credit

National

57

2

11

8

11

4

5

2

Primarily

Undergrad.

54

2

12

9

12

4

5

2

Acadia

49

1

11

11

13

9

5

1

Table 5 – Comparison of CAUBO data for the year 2007.  Numbers are percentage of total expenses allocated to each sector.

It appears that the trend of increased spending on administration and decreased spending in the academic sector has continued into 2007-08.  This information has been presented to the Joint Finance Committee and we have been promised further insight into these trends.  We have also been given some preliminary data for the 2008-09 year that suggest that some changes may have occurred.

 

Peter Williams

 

Table of Contents